Nobody told me The Book Thief was a
holocaust book. I resent it a little. Holocaust literature isn’t something you
just drop on people, no warning, no chance to brace themselves. It’s worse
because I was gifted my copy on the Kindle, so there were no back cover hints.
I just started reading and then I was in WWII Germany.
You should read it. (Mild spoilers below.)
It’s soul crushing in a different way than Fugitive Pieces or The Boy In the
Striped Pajamas. It’s stylistically playful in ways Night or The Diary of Anne
Frank can’t touch. It made me cry on the train home from work.
At one point the main characters, Germans,
hide a Jew. A German Jew. Somehow before this book it hadn’t hit me how many
German Jews there were when Hitler rose to power—how anti-Jew policies had
cropped up when Jews were right there, living in the open in German cities,
even serving in German armies in WWI. You can see where I’m going with this, I
hope.
I’m not an alarmist. I don’t think an
American gay holocaust is in the offing, and although I believe it could happen
here, I also believe it won’t. The point is, though, that in The Book Thief the
Germans who were willing to shelter this Jew, and to stand up how and when they
could for other Jews, were the people who knew them personally. Knew them as
people. Not abstraction, not other, not propaganda caricatures. In the wake of
my last post, of course I’m thinking of this in terms of coming out.
See, once I came out to my parents and then
years later when I made it clear I was done with the church, it wasn’t just The
Gays out there agitating like they do. It was their little boy. It’s his loves
and hopes and dreams. The members of my parents’ ward don’t dare speak
unthinkingly about The Gays because that’s Matthew, the sweet little guy who
used to babysit our kids and raise the American flag at the Fourth of July
pancake breakfast. (It’s also Phaedra, the relief society president’s /
two-cycles-back bishop’s daughter. Happy memory: Phaedra and I once went door
to door as Mary and Joseph at a ward event.)
This is one reason why coming out is so
important. People who know us as we are don’t accept propaganda so easily.
People who know us as we are are no longer able to sit comfortably and condemn
The Gays down in San Francisco. They have to think twice before writing off
that group of Others because now it includes people who maybe aren’t so other
after all.
Maybe this doesn’t even need to be said,
but it seemed important to me on the train today that it was the personal
connection with Jews that enabled the main characters of The Book Thief to hold
on to their humanity when everyone around them was letting theirs slip away.
The more people come out, the more people know about the gay people in their
lives, the harder it will be to turn the rest of the population against us.
I wish we were at a point where I felt
silly for worrying about a thing like that, but I’m Californian and Prop 8 was
just four years ago. DADT was repealed and there were some lovely
marriage-related results in the last election, but DOMA is still entrenched,
with certain substantial forces looking to make it permanent. It’s only been in
my lifetime that “sodomy” was decriminalized in the last fourteen states, and
many of those laws are technically still on the books. I know how quickly
policy can retrench—have you seen pictures of 1970s Iran?—and I know how little
say I might have in that retrenchment.
I guess what I’m saying is that I miss
being surrounded by people who would hide me—or stand beside me—in the event of
some kind of gay extermination order. _Or_ a zombie apocalypse. One is more
plausible than the other, but the people I’d want to be with are the same.
***
On that note, I decided. On Monday I found
out I would be recording a listening test with that one boy’s teacher—a
perfect, private opportunity to talk with him about this. During my lunch break
I wrote out what I would say (in cursive, which is like a secret code) and then
rewrote it and then practiced it in my head. I felt great about it. A little heady.
Then we were alone in the recording room,
and I knew I wouldn’t tell him.
Last week’s lion-and-handcart speech is
still true. I just plain did not want that man to know I’m gay. I don’t think
I’ll be coming out to anyone new in the months before I leave this country. I
still believe it’s damaging, but I think it’s mitigated by having made a
conscious decision to not share that part of myself. It helps that it’s limited
to the circumstances of working here in Japan, where I’ll be for less than half
a year more. It helps that I have Facebook and Skype and a lively
correspondence with people who do know that part of me, and even a handful of
people who come across the planet and spend time with me.
It’s not perfect, but I’m satisfied with my
decision.
***
This week, I’m going to think about what it
might be like to be in a committed relationship.
***
This post comes to you from Kyoto, Japan,
where I spent the entire day being a tourist with an old friend. We wandered in
circles this morning, but eventually we found our way to Kiyomizudera, a temple
on a hill—thus, this picture.
I feel so happy.
*post by Matt*
*post by Matt*
Oh Matt I'm so glad that you are writing for this blog. You have such great insights. I love the whole point, to some were just a group they hate but then we become their friends or coworkers and it's hard to put that label on us. I appreciate the analogy. Also that picture is awesome. Is that the sign in ASL for lesbian?
ReplyDeleteThank you! I'm tickled to say that that is the ASL sign for lesbian and also that I didn't know that until looking it up just now. :)
DeleteI really like that book. And I liked your analogy. Nice post.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it wonderful? Such an inventive perspective.
DeleteMatt, you're great. I love this post. Sometimes I feel discouraged about the people I know. The ones who know me on a personal level yet still have all these crazy ideas about laws and politics and what is "right and wrong" but I think you're right. If there ever were some kind of gay holocaust--which I don't think would EVER happen, but hypothetically, I know there are people who would hide me...AND Jo :) if it came to that.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to have to read that book because I keep hearing about it all the time. But I'm glad you told me it was a holocaust book because no one ever mentioned that part before. :)
Thank you! I felt like it was what I needed to write, since I've been thinking so much about coming out and not coming out and why for each. For me, knowing those hypothetical hiders are out there is a big comfort.
DeleteAnd you know, I just had a thought--perhaps one reason I'm content not coming out here is that if the tide turned against gay people here, I could just go home. Back in the states, though, I needed to be out.
Interesting. Please do carefully pick up The Book Thief, I think it's worth your time.
Indeed, very good insights. It is frightening to think how quickly things can change. I think about that being here where I am, sometimes, how Americans are generally treated quite well, but all it would take is one high-profile thing to happen and the whole of public opinion could come crashing down on us and actually put us in danger... It's not likely, but it's there. Certainly, the same is true, like you say, for basically all minorities. What you say about letting people personally know each other is indeed key...
ReplyDeleteWhew! For a second there, I was thinking, "Uh oh, now all my own excuses of not being out at work are shot away." Ha ha. Seriously, though, I like how you acknowledge the damage of not coming out but make a conscious decision not to be out and essentially take control of your situation. I certainly don't feel like I'm doing that, myself, right now... but am making progress.
Glad things are going well!
Right? Things can change so fast. I don't think it's wise to lose sight of that.
DeleteAnd I have a feeling you'll come out at work before long. Probably by the time I put up next week's post, hinthintnudgenudge.
On a related note, does anyone have opinions on replying to comments individually vs. replying to them all in a single separate comment? Do they each send a notification to everyone? That could get annoying.
they each send a message to those who subscribe to the comments...but personally, I like the individual responses to each because that way they're actually attached with the comment it's replying to, which is nice when you get discussions going in the comments. :)
Delete